SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greg nus who wrote (88039)1/19/2000 2:18:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 1588505
 
nus - <pb ok go ahead and put some of the blame a non existing resession. See your starting to prove my point about dummys looking smarter than they are.>

You're really up with it, I can see. I meant for the SEMI sector alone.

You can call me whatever you want, as long as I don't have to assume your investment portfolio. I like mine just fine, regardless of your assessment of Intel's earnings.

Are you going to short INTC, due to your dummy factor? With your scenario, it would seem a no-brainer. Please post when you do so. I want to see just how smart you really are so I can learn the error of my ways.

PB




To: greg nus who wrote (88039)1/19/2000 2:21:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1588505
 
Greg Re <<go ahead and put some of the blame a non existing resession. See your starting to prove my point about dummys looking smarter than they are. >>

Woho! Greg, dude, slow down.

PB was referring to the semi slow down. Just look at the chart for ^SOX (Philadelphia Sem. Con. Index). You's see that semi's are indeed very cyclical and in fact there was a slowdown in 1997&98.

Mani


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News