Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : General Magic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ronald C. Vinyard who wrote (7772)	1/19/2000 5:39:00 PM
From: Sye Walsh	Respond to of 10081

Before this goes any further... There was a previous news (Dec 1999) Ask the analyst. biz.yahoo.com dgurgel seems to have thought your newer news post was the same one biz.yahoo.com Relax Sye

To: Ronald C. Vinyard who wrote (7772)	1/19/2000 9:22:00 PM
From: Seconds Out	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10081

Ron, I heard exactly what you heard. It seems like a misunderstanding as to which interview was being discussed. The "old" interview Dave mentioned occurred a couple of points lower in stock price. While it is quite possible GMGC could give up some of its outstanding recent gains, the company and the stock price both seem to be heading in the right direction for the long haul. Seconds Out.

To: Ronald C. Vinyard who wrote (7772)	1/20/2000 3:30:00 AM
From: dgurgel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10081

I apologize for my error. I listened to the 12/31 clip by J.P. Gulli at the URL given to me by StraightUp. He wanted me to listen to the 1/18 clip by Nye, but I missed that until this morning when you pointed out my mistake. Nye's comments were much different than those of Gulli and could be said to be generally supportive of GMGC. Thank you Sye Walsh in 7773 for finding my mistake before I did. I enjoyed reading the SI GMGC board and hope my posts have added information to the debate on the merits of GMGC.