SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (4522)1/20/2000 12:12:00 PM
From: Rogue Warrior  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5164
 
Good article and good to see you posting again. Agree that SGGNF can be reviewed but you know their history. I doubt they will have a favourable ruling in Michigan (or all sources are lying) and that leaves the fun park and and the 'horsy game'.

Until they have a 'sod turner', they have hype and that only of last Friday as I recall.

In the interests of those who've been 'abused or clobbered' by SGGNF, may they put soemthing together. They'll have my thanks but their approach to IR has been atrocious to this point in time. You, more than anyone, have seen their approaches to impending disaster - the torpedo hits and then the reactive planning begins.

Simple and truthful news releases would have done so much damage control - they chose otherwise and I'm still not sure they have learned anything over the years. On a positive note, as they blundered along, they didn't give up but fought against horrific odds and stayed alive to this point. That type of tenacity and the strong American presense means that they might actually pull it off.

In my opinion, I still feel the odds are remote and if you're out, suggest staying out until they have more than potential and the 'next project'. But then you summarized it in your post and I'm talking to someone who has seen this 'zoo' running for years. Keep posting - I think all of us owe you a great deal in all your past efforts and at your personal expense. Too bad that John L. seems 'elsewhere'.

R.W.