Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Frank Coluccio Technology Forum - ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1001)	1/21/2000 1:55:00 PM
From: majaman1978	Respond to of 1782

Looks like Nanovation fooled MIT as well, right??????: biz.yahoo.com

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1001)	1/22/2000 11:51:00 AM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1782

It's only baffling because its explanation lies in the frontier of quantum optics. You readily accept WDM and other photon based technologies, yet you can't even begin to explain what a photon is. Why not apply the same criterion to SR. That is, is there a working model of what it does? There is. So the question becomes why are the major laboratories and think tanks ignoring this development? The answer is that they can't see how this invention can fit in our existing technological matrix and the inventor has poisoned the stream of information about it for reasons almost assuredly egomaniacal.