Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (74147)	1/20/2000 4:07:00 PM
From: IceShark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Trickster, May not have been the best prices, but they nailed teh market, generally. Oh well. BTW, did I say DIE, intc, you POS, DIE!

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (74147)	1/21/2000 12:23:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 132070

To All, Gateway stank the house out. EPS down 5% for an overpriced fluff stock that is supposed to grow earnings. Of course, only the business is bad. The spin is still good. If earnings grow negatively to zero, the stock can triple if they keep the spin going. <g> IBM's SG&A mystery was not really a mystery. I forgot that, unlike Intel and Microsoft, they take gains on sales of subsidiaries directly in SG&A as a reduction in cost. Thus, the "better than expected" eps in a quarter that was otherwise a total disaster.