SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Process Boy who wrote (88602)1/20/2000 4:46:00 PM
From: Yougang Xiao  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573447
 
PB, You and I MAY have a common enemy here for today's actions in both AMD and Intel shares:

As an AMD shareholder, I consider Osha's prediction of Intel's heavy price war again with AMD unlikely, as many posters here elequently laid out the reasons.

Do you or any other Intel shareholders agree with Osha, or in support of such price action by Intel?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
07:37am EST 20-Jan-00 Merrill Lynch (J.Osha (1) 212 449-0930) AMD
ADVANCED MICRO:A Solid Quarter - Now the Real Fight Begins

ML++ML++ML Merrill Lynch Global Securities Research ML++ML++ML
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES (AMD/NYSE)
A Solid Quarter - Now the Real Fight Begins
Joseph Osha (1) 212 449-0930
NEUTRAL*

Long Term
NEUTRAL

Reason for Report: Earnings Reported

Price: $39 3/16

Estimates (Dec) 1999A 2000E
EPS: $d2.21 $1.94
P/E: NM 20.2x
EPS Change (YoY): NM
Q1 EPS (Mar): $d0.81 $0.36

Cash Flow/Share: $2.90 $5.62
Price/Cash Flow: 13.5x 7.0x

Dividend Rate: Nil Nil
Dividend Yield: Nil Nil

Opinion & Financial Data
Investment Opinion: C-3-3-9
Mkt. Value / Shares Outstanding (mn): $5,995.7 / 152.8
Book Value/Share (Dec-1999): $13.46
Price/Book Ratio: 2.9x
ROE 2000E Average: 11.2%
LT Liability % of Capital: 43.0%
Est. 5 Year EPS Growth: 15.0%

Stock Data
52-Week Range: $41 1/4-$14 9/16
Symbol / Exchange: AMD / NYSE
Options: Pacific
Institutional Ownership-Spectrum: 41.8%

ML Industry Weightings & Ratings**
Strategy; Weighting Rel. to Mkt.:
Income: Underweight (07-Mar-1995)
Growth: Overweight (13-May-1999)
Income & Growth: Overweight (13-May-1999)
Capital Appreciation: Overweight (10-Feb-1999)

Market Analysis; Technical Rating: Above Average (25-Jun-1999)

*Intermediate term opinion last changed on 18-Mar-1999.
**The views expressed are those of the macro department and do not necessarily
coincide with those of the Fundamental analyst.
For full investment opinion definitions, see footnotes.

Investment Highlights:
o AMD reported revenue and earnings for the December quarter that
significantly exceeded our expectations. Net earnings were $65 million or
$0.43 per share as compared to our estimate of an $0.11 loss, and revenue
reached $968 million as compared to our estimate of $844 million.

o For 2000, we are revising our earnings estimate upwards from $1.18 to
$1.94, on revenue of $4.2 billion.

o Given our concerns about a counterattack from Intel in Q1, however, we are
maintaining our neutral rating for now.

Fundamental Highlights:
o AMD did an excellent job ramping production of its Athlon processor during
the quarter - Athlon production reached 1m units, and total processor sales
reached 6 million.

o We expect AMD to ship 7.6 million Athlons in 2000.

Great quarter - now get ready for the Intel counterattack

AMD reported revenue and earnings for the December quarter that significantly
exceeded our expectations. Net earnings were $65 million or $0.43 per share as
compared to our estimate of an $0.11 loss, and revenue reached $968 million as
compared to our estimate of $844 million. For 2000, we are revising our
earnings estimate upwards from $1.18 to $1.94, on revenue of $4.2 billion.
Given the volatility of the company's operations we are not yet initiating a
2001 earnings estimate.

Despite the excellent performance from AMD for the December quarter, we're
remaining neutral on the stock for now. The December quarter was an
interesting time - with Intel supply-constrained, PC OEMs were struggling to
find adequate supply, and AMD stepped into the breach admirably. Now, however,
Intel is ramping its Coppermine part, which may not enjoy as much of a
technology lead over AMD's Athlon as Intel would like, but which is nonetheless
competitive.

The result, we think, will be a tussle as Intel looks to regain the market
share from AMD that it lost during the December quarter. We note that Mercury
Research showed AMD's market share at 17% for the December quarter, back
towards the high end of the historic market share range for the company. AMD
now has a competitive part for the consumer and low-end corporate desktop
market that it is hoping to drive into the more profitable big-enterprise
desktop and low-end server markets.

Those markets, unlike the lower end of the desktop market that was the subject
of AMD's previous market share offensive, are the core of Intel's business and
profitability. We think that it is highly implausible to imagine Intel sitting
back and allowing AMD to build critical mass in the corporate desktop and low-
end server markets. Rather, we expect Intel to respond with aggressive
pricing, just as it has in the past when AMD has shown signs of life. The
result, we believe, should be a tough pricing environment for both companies
during the coming two quarters.

In our opinion, AMD's performance for the quarter can only be described as
excellent. The company met the goal that it had set for itself of selling near
1m Athlon processors - the number sold was 800,000, and AMD could have sold
more had motherboard infrastructure problems not been an issue. The company
managed to make 1 million Athlons. Total processor unit sales for the quarter
were slightly above 6 million. Good performance from the flash memory business
was the other major contributor to revenue growth, which was 46% sequentially.
Gross margin was up substantially to 40%, from last quarter's 28.4%.

Looking forward, we think that the big questions to be addressed are pricing,
as we mentioned, and AMD's ability to fill the growing infrastructure that it
is building for itself. The Athlon is ramping, to be sure - we expect the part
to ship 7.6 million units in 2000. However, even taking into account the boost
in ASPs resulting from the rollover to Athlon, AMD will need to continue to
make and sell K62s if it wants to fill its Texas and Dresden fabs. It is hard
to see how much more life the K62 has left, given Intel's continued
aggressiveness with the Celeron and the tendency of consumers to buy on the
basis of clock speed.

In the end, although we have raised our numbers for 2000, we think that the
degree of volatility to the estimates does not merit becoming more constructive
on the stock yet. If it turns out that AMD is in fact able to hold off the
Intel counteroffensive in the coming months, we think investors would be able
to move to take advantage of AMD's success then. In our view, Investors need
not be worried about missing all of the upside - even at $50 AMD would be
trading on only 1.9x prospective revenue, far below the industry.

Opinion Key (X-a-b-c): Investment Risk Rating(X): A - Low, B - Average, C -
Above Average, D - High. Appreciation Potential Rating (a: Int. Term - 0-12
mo.; b: Long Term - >1 yr.): 1 - Buy, 2 - Accumulate, 3 - Neutral, 4 - Reduce,
5 - Sell, 6 - No Rating. Income Rating(c): 7 - Same/Higher, 8 - Same/Lower, 9
- No Cash Dividend.

Copyright 2000 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S).
This report has been issued and approved for publication in the United Kingdom
by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Limited, which is regulated by SFA,
and has been considered and issued in Australia by Merrill Lynch Equities
(Australia) Limited (ACN 006 276 795), a licensed securities dealer under the
Australian Corporations Law. The information herein was obtained from various
sources; we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Additional
information available.

Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer, or an
invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or any options,
futures or other derivatives related to such securities ("related
investments"). MLPF&S and its affiliates may trade for their own accounts as
odd-lot dealer, market maker, block positioner, specialist and/or arbitrageur
in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments, and may be on
the opposite side of public orders. MLPF&S, its affiliates, directors,
officers, employees and employee benefit programs may have a long or short
position in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments. MLPF&S
or its affiliates may from time to time perform investment banking or other
services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any entity
mentioned in this report.

This research report is prepared for general circulation and is circulated for
general information only. It does not have regard to the specific investment
objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person
who may receive this report. Investors should seek financial advice regarding
the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies
discussed or recommended in this report and should understand that statements
regarding future prospects may not be realized. Investors should note that
income from such securities, if any, may fluctuate and that each security's
price or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive back less
than originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to
future performance.

Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or
income of any security or related investment mentioned in this report. In
addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, whose values are influenced by
the currency of the underlying security, effectively assume currency risk.
First Call Corporation, a Thomson Financial company.
All rights reserved. 888.558.2500

-> End of Note <-



To: Process Boy who wrote (88602)1/20/2000 6:14:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573447
 
PB,

Just out with it.

We all want to hear the corncerns frankly i do.

BTW, I read Osha's piece and he makes some very good points.

Essentially the ball is in Intels court.

As the big gorilla they have to decide wether ceding 20-30% market share to AMD is acceptable.

If not they have no option but to SLASH prices.

If they have a differentiated high margin product such as Servers,Laptops then perhaps they can see their way to slashing coppermine pricing while at same time essentially eliminating the celeron line.

As i see it:

Current model:

10M Katmai/Cumines at $300 = $3bn
15M Celerons at $60 = $900mn

They all cost the basically the same.

An alternative model for Q1/Q2 could be:

22M Cumines at $150 = $3.3bn
3M Celerons at $60 = $180mn

Yes there would be an overall loss of top line revenue but Cumines cost much less so maybe can be made up in other growing areas : laptops, servers, investment/interest revenue.

Frankly I had expected Intel to try something like this in Q2-Q3 but not in Q1 as osha is suggesting.

Clearly Intel has tremendous flexibility in their overall model, while AMD is lumbered with the off chip cache.

The BIG unknown is speed bin distribution.

If Intel has Much better speed distribution than they think AMD can do then I would certainly expect them to try it.

Adds an interesting mielieu to the mix.

regards,

Kash