Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: w molloy who wrote (3365)	1/21/2000 2:37:00 PM
From: Eric L	Respond to of 34857

w, << Perhaps you can ask 'engineer' or 'clark' for clarification on the QCOM S&P thread >> Good suggestion and thanks for your comments. - Eric -

To: w molloy who wrote (3365)	1/21/2000 4:19:00 PM
From: Mika Kukkanen	Respond to of 34857

About the differences in terminology or even standards: There is a lot of stuff that comes out that may give ammunition for anyone to take a stance. Unfortunately the nuances with words is meant for other audiences and we all get sucked into the furorre. Much is about radio spectrum, and I will give a brief example: I noticed in a recent US report -costing like $2K plus, the terminology of GSM and then GSM 1800, yet they classified CDMA as one. Of course I am more likely to know that the original report was sponsored by someone -guess or more likely a consortium- and yet the publisher can then freely distribute at more than cost to anyone else that it is independent. Anyway, I will stand by my previous post as correct, however I will never get into thew dogma that some many have been sucked into. All the best for the weekend. Back again Wednesday as I am off on another tour of Scandiland! M