Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (97086)	1/22/2000 2:23:00 PM
From: Barry Grossman	Respond to of 186894

Ten, A terrific reply. But just like the naysayers were proven wrong in the past, I can almost guarantee you that you will be proven wrong in the future. Just watch Barry

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (97086)	1/23/2000 7:40:00 PM
From: Wolff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tenchusatsu, what do believe my premise to be, I am sorry but NO, I do not think Intel is going to fade into the dust. NO! not by a long short. I agree that the capacity that Intel has is formidable and dominant. Clearly the only thing that Craig has done meaningful in his time at Intel is kick the snot out of the Manufacturing Fabs and get them to a consistent and world class caliber. Before him, they were iffy. But Craig has no other vision, he is uninspired generally. So Ten, you may choose to cast me as a ranting nay-sayer fine, but look at the content of what I am saying, its not willy-nilly as you imply. Yes I was again wrong on Intel's last quarter, yes the threw in the kitchen sink into 3rd quarter, as far as costs, and cleaned up for the 4th quarter. This market would need a strong catalyst to tank and correct, given my assumptions and Gateway, Y2K, I made a wrong prediction. I still am looking for a catalyst the would tank the market, the only one I saw for the early part of the year was the potential of Intel missing. Again I was wrong, I can deal with it, hope you can. I am pointing out where Intel is miss-executing, if a B grade is good enough for Intel that is fine, my target is always 100% and Intel is not there now. 1996 yes, 2000 NO wolff