SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: A. Borealis who wrote (13722)1/22/2000 7:48:00 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 13994
 
<<Big deal!! So what!!
And GWB is owned by [almost] every special interest in the country.>>

I could well say, "If I have to explain it , you can't understand because you've been blinded".

The "BIG DEAL" is, GWB HAS NOT been elected yet!!!!!! We have no proof GWB will be paid off - as these are only possible future events, Here is(more) proof the current JERK is currently being paid off!

GIVE ONE SINGEL BIT of PROOF GWB IS "OWNED". He may be in the process of being financed by, BUT there are miles of difference between "MAY BE"(or may not) owned in the future, & is CURRENTLY BOUGHT & PAID FOR!

Give one bit of proof GWB is corrupt - in any way. Just one! One place he gave for what the got in the past!

Even if you can prove one is a crook would not excuse another crook.

If one is to follow your (lack of) logic then as the FBI did NOT get convicted for killing the people at Ruby Ridge or Waco, then it OK for any Governmental agency to kill anyone in any curch or home.



To: A. Borealis who wrote (13722)1/22/2000 9:28:00 AM
From: gao seng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
GWB IS OWNED by a bunch of people who sent him 100 bucks. And with 500,000 people doing that, he doesn't need special interest money. That is why special interest money says he is owned.



To: A. Borealis who wrote (13722)1/22/2000 7:16:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 13994
 
Proof? Has he been selling high speed computers to the Chinese or something like that? JLA



To: A. Borealis who wrote (13722)1/25/2000 11:09:00 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 13994
 
Judge Rejects White House Privilege Claim

Associated Press
Tuesday, January 25, 2000; Page A02

Brushing aside objections by President Clinton, a judge gave the go-ahead yesterday for more questioning in a lawsuit by former government employees whose FBI background files were collected by the White House.

U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth said Judicial Watch, the conservative group that filed the suit, should be permitted to question former FBI official Larry Potts about his work for a private investigative firm that also had been retained by Clinton's legal team in the Monica S. Lewinsky scandal.

Clinton objected to questions about contacts Potts had with the FBI since he began working for the firm, Investigative Group International, because it would force Potts to reveal privileged communications(cont)
washingtonpost.com