SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (97127)1/22/2000 10:31:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim - <Also SI is reporting .61 for Intel vs the .69 they reported?>

.61 on a diluted share basis.

Message 12644508

Intel didn't fudge the numbers. It was there for all to see. Niles made two EPS estimate and price target revisions within 4 days. Obviously, most folks on the street thought the numbers were good (0.645 without securities upside).

If you really think Intel fudged the numbers, I'm sure Micheal Burke would love to hear from you.

PB



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (97127)1/22/2000 7:51:00 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 186894
 
Jim,

Do a search, you will find out more about Crusoe than you ever wanted to know.

John



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (97127)1/22/2000 8:48:00 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim,

Just thought you would like to know, Thomas M thinks your (and I assume other Intel investors) sentiment is "disgusting":

Message 12648943

John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News