Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (88995)	1/22/2000 6:10:00 PM
From: milo_morai	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572227

PB, could you please point the thread to some LINKS that will give us some info to go alone with your statements. Thankyou in Advance. Milo

To: Process Boy who wrote (88995)	1/22/2000 8:57:00 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572227

PB Re << I believe the response to this simplistic argument, is something along the lines of BFD>> Simplistic or not, Milo's argument makes sense, no reason to get vulgar. You said many times that manufacturing copper in volume is different than making a few in process development environment, due to CU contamination issues. AMD has experience in that respect and Intel does not. Re << If you think this is a huge advantage for AMD, fine.>> And if you want to believe that Intel ramps the 0.13 CU before AMD, FINE! Unless you provide some links proving your opinion, it is just that, an opinion. It seems to me that you expect your statements to not get challenged because you work in a fab. It does not work like that here PB. Mani