SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (89062)1/23/2000 1:11:00 AM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572298
 
PB, now you are twisting my words. I never said
"And both you and Milo have failed in my mind to present a case as to why Intel not going to Cu at .18 is folly."


I said very clear that AMD would have a 12+ Month head start on copper over INTC.

Milo



To: Process Boy who wrote (89062)1/23/2000 8:43:00 PM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572298
 
PB re <<And both you and Milo have failed in my mind to present a case as to why Intel not going to Cu at .18 is folly.>>

What in the word are you talking about?

Why are asking me to present a case for an argument or a claim that I never made. When did I say Intel is making a mistake by not going to CU in 0.18?

Sigh!

Mani


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News