SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (533)1/23/2000 11:40:00 AM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 52153
 
Interesting fresh article on small molecules especially for people like me without great, (any), knowledge in this area.

biomednet.com

Snip>>>>>>>>>>>>>
PROFILE

Getting Rid of Radicals
MetaPhore Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.

by William A. Wells

Reprinted with permission from Chemistry &
Biology.
Posted January 21, 2000 ú Issue 70

Abstract

Small molecules that mimic enzymes can destroy radicals - those reactive nasties that might just
kill you.

Modern molecular biology is geared towards genes and proteins, with small molecule chemistry
coming in a distant third. Small molecules are important as drugs, but largely ignored in
understanding how the cell works.

SNIP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (533)1/23/2000 3:12:00 PM
From: A.J. Mullen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
Why should competition for the health-care dollar encourage small molecule drugs? I imagine large molecules might cost more to produce, but that those costs are still small compared to R&D. Perhaps with many good drugs coming to market and competing, the effective royalty rate will be depressed, and this would increase the significance of costs production. Is that your reasoning?

Wouldn't drugs still compete largely on grounds of effectiveness? If so, the argument that large-molecule drugs are better targeted would suggest they could be the most effective. Or is it a fallacy that large molecule drugs are better targeted?

Ashley



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (533)1/27/2000 11:28:00 PM
From: N/E PATSFAN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
[re:small molecules]

Rick, did you see this (what a stupid ?) and have you got any knowledge of their ops or mgmt (another stupid ?)

techstocks.com

NEPF