SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (89125)1/23/2000 10:09:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1572689
 
Re: "BY staying the course however IBM has perfected the process and now has a 2 yr lead on Intel. "

That doesn't mean much until you can present some kind of advantage this gives IBM. Their processors still run slower than Intel processors.

EP



To: hmaly who wrote (89125)1/23/2000 11:24:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572689
 
hmaly - <The question is; in hindsight and considering AMD likely will introduce a 900mhz copper 2h-00;wouldn't Intel be in a better position now if they had put more effort into copper.>

What in the HECK is the difference? I.e., if Intel keeps introducing comparable MHz on Aluminum...any extraneous effort on .18 would have been an expensive waste of time. Get it?????

A-L. It works.

PB


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News