Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MNI who wrote (15842)	1/24/2000 11:59:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 17770

I am not sure that Helms was directly addressing these issues. The United Nations is a separate matter, I think.... I am thinking of situations like this: Scotland strives for greater autonomy within the UK, and UK, at the same time,is a leading member of the European Union. Scotland has a stake in preserving the UK, because it has more clout in tandem with England and Northern Ireland than it would alone, dealing with Brussels. As for the "intermediate supra- national but regional institutions", I have read that there are associations linking economic regions, for example, northwestern Italy and southeastern France, although I have not followed the issue much........

To: MNI who wrote (15842)	1/25/2000 10:42:00 AM
From: John Lacelle	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 17770

MNI, Jessie Helms earns my respect! Am I the only one who thinks that the United States should not turn into a UN Protectorate? Great nations lead by example, not by turning themselves into pawns of a pathetic assembly of corruption. The UN has done nothing but fail in its efforts to bring peace and prosperity to the world. Now these liberal loons like the Clintons want the US to live under UN law. I think we should just pull out and let the stupid assembly crumble. -John