Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: baystock who wrote (47424)	1/24/2000 11:41:00 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

> But only a dumb schmuck would buy ABX even if they > believed gold would stay flat or decline from these low prices Gee, thanks for the compliment, I bought some ABX today ;)

To: baystock who wrote (47424)	1/25/2000 1:13:00 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 116759

Ram, without any technical understanding in mining I can identify the many holes in your post. Either you are really lacking in the ability to communicate, or maybe just didn't take the time to do atleast a minimal effort and put out that babble stuff. <<Barrick can't have it both ways.>> As in logic, A is A and cannot at the same time be B. ok But really, the issue here is time related, and at different times the hedging of Barrick may not only be valid, but some say excellant. <<share investors expect...they need to be warned...>> You word "need" is a no no, as in if they need that type of help, then they are not ready to invest, and if do so then any poor outcome that they receive is a result of their not looking before jumping. <<...like yourself who believe gold won't appreciate...>> <<believe>> ??? What has that to do with the future except for speculation, or wrost case, a guess ??? I hope & wish, yes, but believe ??? <<...only a dumb schmuck would buy ABX even if...> What you say is dumb & babble, but you saying it tags yourself as stupid. doug