SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ballard Power -world leader zero-emission PEM fuel cells -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael a. rowe who wrote (4904)1/24/2000 10:10:00 PM
From: W. Randy Gast  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5827
 
Rowe, this is your finest work ever. A "little"? obsessive but ! addresses a lot of issues. I personally think that cell co's should all have the same market cap ... we could all go up to PLUG's ( hee hee ) and be rrrich ! Why don't you post this on GLE's thread ... I hear they're open minded.



To: michael a. rowe who wrote (4904)1/24/2000 10:28:00 PM
From: miklosh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5827
 
Great reply Michael! Now could you please do a comparison of Ballard versus Plug <g>?? Seriously, does plug have something on Ballard technologically, or was todays divergence just stock momentum mania?

regards



To: michael a. rowe who wrote (4904)1/24/2000 10:50:00 PM
From: Ponderosa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5827
 
Michael; Re: ..."by the way i doubt anybody will read this far down and they didnt read your initial post either"

Well, I read 'em... and, I liked yours the best! I'm a relatively new BLDP investor but have been following this one for a couple of years... I wish I had the courage of my convictions a month or so ago but, despite todays mauling, this stock will be great longer term IMHO. BLDP has great, timely, technology that addresses a massive potential market. Thanks for your balanced post... it helped reinforce my views.



To: michael a. rowe who wrote (4904)1/25/2000 2:21:00 AM
From: blue_chip  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5827
 
Mr Rowe,
You are incorrect about much of your response to thatr post, firstly you will see I never wrote it if you look at the heading again. Secondly, your response to it is incorrect.

Chip