SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Dickson who wrote (3978)1/25/2000 7:05:00 AM
From: Mark Bartlett  Respond to of 4504
 
Jeff,

Thanks for the update -- things looking very positive at the moment for MAN. I suspect there is something more near surface at some point in that anomaly -- it cetainly is big enough.

MB



To: Jeff Dickson who wrote (3978)1/25/2000 9:16:00 AM
From: Bruce Robbins  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4504
 
>>but at the same time it is hard to believe that gravity anomaly gave from something that deep alone. So there is a good chance that there sulphide mass closer to the surface, or this thing is deep and huge.<<

Jeff,

IMO it is deep and possibly huge. The gravity anomaly would have been stronger if it was closer to the surface and they would have seen traces of the sulfide horizon in the top of hole 2. MAN knows what they are looking for at this point. The hole definitely proves that most of these gravity anomalies will come up with sulfides. Good news. The anomaly that piques my interest is TG-4 (west of TG-1). I wonder why they haven't drilled that one yet.

Bruce



To: Jeff Dickson who wrote (3978)1/27/2000 6:20:00 PM
From: Sailfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
OK..Tks agn Jeff...

The really nice, warm, fuzzy thing about this is that the gravity anomaly contours suggest that the greater portion of any VMS deposit associated with this anomaly could very well be contained within the Lancones concession which is 100% owned by Manhattan...

Something ran this stock up to $5.60 yesterday...Maybe it was just an unconfirmable/unconfirmed rumour...

The stock can't be held at this level for long with what is happening...

Although Bruce feels I am a tad optimistic, ;-) I am still inclined to stick with my estimation of a $20 takeover price...

Regards....Ray