SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: johnd who wrote (26742)1/25/2000 12:23:00 PM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 64865
 
Johnd:

I may be overly optimistic based on past performance.

But the only point I agree with you on is the execution of Ultra 3. Execution on this chip has been much worse than normal for Sun, and if they don't pull that together the problems really start.

I don't consider IBM, HWP or Wintel commodity boxmakers a threat if the Ultra 3 is pulled together. IBM continues to get their butt kicked by Sun and their new Linux strategy is just a sign of further strategic thrashing, yet another new direction that will take years if ever to bear fruit.

HWP is dependent on IA64, which could turn out to be a disaster for INTC and HWP (plus others). If it does become a threat to Sun, it can't do so for 2 more years in terms of taking market share. This is why the Ultra 3 execution is critical: Zander talks about his lead; he will lose it if Ultra 3 doesn't ship immediately.

I think Win2000 is probably a "Go Directly to Jail Without Passing Go" card on the server side for Wintel. It's 32 bits and will prove to be unsustainably buggy as soon as it's asked to run hard. It's also 2 years away from anything on big servers; and I don't see what the 2-way and 4-way space has to do with anything. There's not a chance in the world that viable 16-way Win2K machines will ship in the next 18 months (unless they're counterfeits like the Unisys machines).

Sun's other main execution challenge, which could blow everything by slowing growth if it's muffed, is the StarPortal/iPlanet part of the world. They have to get their software act together, something that, while they've been good at it, has never been a profit center for them.

So I have plenty of worries, but we differ on one point: I believe the game is Sun's to lose.

Regards,
--QwikSand



To: johnd who wrote (26742)1/25/2000 12:32:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
It is important to look from all angles. Not just rosier
and rosier glasses. Just helping overly optimistic folks
on this thread.


Oh. Helping? Let me help you help us. We overly optimistic folks have been long SUNW for contiguous *years. A very small percentage of us are interested in sell side analysis.

If you want to 'help' us, keep that in mind. If you want to help *yourself you'll want to go and stay long SUNW (buy and hold), and reconsider this echolalic urban myth regarding fair value and P/E. (IMO)

-JCJ



To: johnd who wrote (26742)1/25/2000 12:56:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 64865
 
Will it go up another 400% in the 12 months
or will it go down 100%...


I doubt very much that it will go down 100%. :-\



To: johnd who wrote (26742)1/25/2000 1:08:00 PM
From: marvin litman  Respond to of 64865
 
JOHN,
Good post....a little reality check is a good thing.
We all have a habit of running away with our imaginations
of a steady rise and that SUN is invincible.
However we have one thing on our side and that is TWISTER.