SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (89396)1/25/2000 2:13:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571911
 
Re: "If the number was 2,000,000 to 2,500,000 then, according to Process Boy, yields on the Coppermine were less than stellar."

Nonetheless, it was over 2X what AMD was able to produce.

EP



To: Petz who wrote (89396)1/25/2000 11:29:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 1571911
 
Petz - <If the number was 2,000,000 to 2,500,000 then, according to Process Boy, yields on the Coppermine were less than stellar.>

This is not true. There is no way you can make this calculation, unless you know the run rate. What's the run rate Petz?

Yields are fine.

PB


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News