SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (89397)1/25/2000 1:28:00 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571903
 
pAUl,

in your response discussing iNtEL's earnings, I was
unable to grasp the relevant points of your post.

Would you care to elaborate?

Make it so,
Mysef



To: Paul Engel who wrote (89397)1/25/2000 2:43:00 PM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571903
 
hmaly - Re: "Shouldn't the question really be how many millions or billions of dollars worth of shares Intel will have to sell this quarter to make estimates"

Paul Re; <How many more HEADQUARTERS buildings does AMD have to sell ?

Can AMD sell VANTIS a second time ?

Paul>

Paul , in a earlier post you stated that AMD had lost money 3 quarters in a row. True if you are using standard accounting procedures excluding one time gains and losses. However if you use standard "Intel" accounting procedures you count the sales but not the cost. Therefore, using standard Intel accounting, AMD SHOULD BE ABLE to use the sale of Vantis once. Since you haven't done that yet (AMD actually had a 53 cent profit 2q-99 if you add the sale of Vantis.)AMD SHOULD HAVE A DEFERRED DEDUCTION for next quarter. If not then quit your whining about "LOSSES 3 QUARTERS IN A ROW"