Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (65252)	1/25/2000 1:33:00 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

I meant more as a candidate, Bradley is a poor alternative, and is having trouble rousing anyone. I saw one poll in Iowa that said that only half of those who were disaffected with Clinton swung to Bradley. If he were a better candidate, who would have profited more.....I mentioned hearing Forbes a couple of years ago, and deciding that he had gotten good at public speaking, so I though that he might have a strong showing......Gore's showing works to Bush's advantage. Republicans do not want to lose, and they especially do not want to lose to Gore. If Gore had been a bit weaker, I would agree that New Hampshire could be volatile......