Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (97527)	1/25/2000 2:33:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten, Why isn't Mr. Gwennap judging Athlon on the same standard as he is judging Itanium's potential performance? He likes to root for the underdog? I was pulling for Tampa Bay on Sunday. Have to admit the Rams uniform still reminds me of LA. I guess I got the gist of your post wrong. I thought you were saying Gwennap was underestimating Itanium's performance. Instead, sounds like you were saying that 30% over Alpha is nothing to sneeze at. Maybe there are NDA's between Intel and the server companies evaluating Itanium until Intel gets the Megahertz up? Haven't seen a thing (I know it's not released). Tony

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (97527)	1/25/2000 2:59:00 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Linley Gwennap and Michael Slater work for Microprocessor Design Reports (MDR). The purpose of the organization is to provide users of designs with reviews. If, every time they did a test, all they had to say is, "buy Intel", there wouldn't be much reason to pay $2,000-$4000 a year for the advice. It would seem the natural bias would be to find fault with the leader. Other than that they seem pretty informed and knowledgeable, at least to finance/business oriented guys who aren't technical, such as myself.