SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CAtechTrader who wrote (64118)1/25/2000 5:30:00 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Pro forma earnings were $.27 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2000, excluding net non-recurring charges and operating results associated with the
QUALCOMM Consumer Products (QCP) business that Kyocera Corporation agreed to purchase, as previously announced in December of 1999. The net
non- recurring charges of approximately $24 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2000 were related primarily to the sale of QCP.


I may get burned in about 15 minutes....but doesnt this mean that the pro-forma number excludes any profits that would have accrued if Kyocera had the handset divsion? It seems like they calculated pro-forma as if the handset division didnt exist. This would exlude quite a bit in royalties and ASIC profits.

Of course I might be wrong....

The ASIC growth definitely seems to be missing....

Slacker



To: CAtechTrader who wrote (64118)1/25/2000 5:37:00 PM
From: RocketMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Good point, catech, the royalty stream upside surprise is very important, since this is where the new qualcomm will grow. Also, the pro forma 0.27 is at least a 50% annual earnings growth, and they said subsequent quarters should be at least as good as this one. The seasonal nature of their handset warning is a wash, just acknowledging the nature of the business. The fact that pros like you are buying at this level is encouraging. Given the mo factor and the volatility in the market in general, I suspect we may get some pretty good bargains over the next few days or weeks.



To: CAtechTrader who wrote (64118)1/25/2000 5:57:00 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
That is more than a 33% upside surprise in royalties. The e were never going to be as important as the royalty number. We will lose some mo mo guys which is great.