SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (26779)1/25/2000 6:24:00 PM
From: professor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Just hit the wire:
Sun Steps Up and Over IBM, HP; Claims Top Spots in High-End and Mid-Range
Server Markets

IDC Report Shows Sun has Maintained Leadership in UNIX Server Shipments
For 10th Consecutive Quarter



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (26779)1/25/2000 7:05:00 PM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
In my book you do not qualify as an serious and intelligent investor no matter the actual or paper gain you have to crow about.

Haim: I'm glad you revisited this thread, since I've had one of your messages printed out and pinned to my bulletin board since April of last year. The one that ends "No need for a response but lets speak in 9 months."

I think the 9 months are up.

Oh by the way, when you wrote this message SUNW was selling at 35 1/8. (I may have that wrong, it may be 17 and change, depending on when the April 99 split was. Doesn't much matter.)

Regards,
--QwikSand

Message 8824604



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (26779)1/25/2000 7:23:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
It is up to you to decide to which group you belong.

I belong to the group with the highest return, Haim; the 'buy and hold' group.

In my book you do not qualify as an serious and intelligent investor no matter the actual or paper gain you have to crow about.

In my book you don't qualify as an 'investor' at all. I only take issue with that because you made an inference in a previous post that you were something other than someone who trades in and out of equities short term.

Your motivation for any given threaded post isn't based on much more than your 'position du Jour', no?

-JCJ



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (26779)1/26/2000 12:37:00 AM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
I guess I don't qualify as a "serious and intelligent investor" by your definintion. It really makes me sad, too -- NOT.

JMHO.