SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MONACO who wrote (152001)1/25/2000 7:24:00 PM
From: TechMkt  Respond to of 176387
 
CNBC (Pat Bolland) reporting that CPQ is DOWN 1 1/4.

Fez



To: MONACO who wrote (152001)1/25/2000 8:16:00 PM
From: Sig  Respond to of 176387
 
Don't let Dog see this one
biz.yahoo.com

<<<'I think their time has come and gone,'' Kumar said, saying one of the only attractive things about Compaq is its relatively
low stock price. ''It's a value play more than anything else.''>>>
Re Niles: He was very close on beating the earnings est, which was accomplished by selling investments for a $50mm profit
He also beat his own revenue estimate of $10 bil. Not hard to beat your own figures!
I guess thats why his last rating on CPQ was a buy- because he
estimated Rev of $10 bil versus last years rev of $10.9 bil.
If you can figure why a decreased revenue estimate represented a "buy" I'd like to know.

Sig



To: MONACO who wrote (152001)1/25/2000 9:41:00 PM
From: rudedog  Respond to of 176387
 
M -
Well I'm having a senior episode on that one but Patrick was kind enough to dig up the reference -
Message 12676362
Niles was vague enough to be in the ball park - he said revenues would be over consensus and EPS "a few cents" over consensus (which was .15 or .16 depending on whether you like Zachs or First Call). So he was pretty close, closer than me anyway, I thought they would be right at revs and a penny over on EPS.

More importantly their commercial PC group showed good sequential unit gains (15%) which leads me to believe that the commercial sector was OK for the quarter... we know already that GTW and IBM were low... Intel was at capacity... I'm starting to like Kelley's analysis a little better.