To: Gus who wrote (2034 ) 1/26/2000 5:19:00 PM From: Clarksterh Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 3376
Gus - Can we be more honest about NTT DoCoMo's dominant position in Japan and the 2001 WCDMA rollout in Japan, Clark? I concede that NTT is *a*, maybe even *the*, dominant wireless player in Japan at this point, if you concede that DDI/IDO CDMAOne is growing much, much faster in percentage terms. But I will bet you a lot of money that NTT does not have a W-CDMA rollout in 2001. If they are lucky they will have a city trial (like IS-95 in Los Angeles many years ago), where they beta test all the loading problems in a real life environment. I expect that to take well over a year for W-CDMA (in contrast, I expect that, as an evolutionary product, it will take only a few months for CDMA-2000).The immutable trend is increased global teledensity. In order to make that happen wireless and wireline manufacturers and carriers need economies of scale AND deregulation. Since the USA is obviously the reference model for global telecom deregulation, where are the superior economies of scale a-forming? Unit cost is a clue. Nicely patronizing<g>, but I'm not sure to whom you are addressing it. Certainly not me since, I have always conceded that GSM has economies of scale. But, to repeat a previous post, a significantly earlier rollout of CDMA-2000 negates much of this advantage. (Note that you missed another cost differential between CDMAOne (or any CDMA) and GSM. CDMA is more complex, and therefore the hardware is almost inevitibly more expensive per line.)I don't think anybody will buy the inartful whoring of Qualcomm as an investment at these price levels just on the basis on any technology (including HDR). When did Qualcomm's stock price enter into this? This is a MCOM board, so the only importance of Qualcomm is the company's (not the stock's) technology and its effect on Metricom's market. I think we are starting to repeat ourselves on these topics as well, so ... . Nice typing to you. Clark