SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SSP who wrote (22225)1/25/2000 10:59:00 PM
From: Katie Kommando  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
 
An interesting late night read:

January 25, 2000

Heard on the Net

Net Firm Wins First Round
In Battle With Online Critic

By AARON ELSTEIN and JASON ANDERS
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL INTERACTIVE EDITION

A small Internet company has won an unusual early victory in its continuing
efforts to silence a critic who has slammed the firm in hundreds of online
message-board posts.

ZiaSun Technologies won a preliminary injunction against Floyd Schneider, a
Saddle River, N.J., mortgage banker who uses the online aliases
"TheTruthseeker" and "Flodyie." Mr. Schneider has been a vocal critic of
ZiaSun and its management, and the injunction bars him from referring to
ZiaSun's officers as "criminals," and from posting false statements alleging
criminal activities by the company.

In June 1999, ZiaSun sued Mr. Schneider and seven other message-board
users in U.S. District Court in Seattle, alleging that they engaged in a
"cybersmear" campaign to ruin the company. The case is expected to proceed
to trial later this year. Mr. Schneider maintains that he has reported only the
truth about a company that he believes has defrauded investors.

In her ruling on the preliminary injunction, U.S.
District Judge Marsha J. Pechman said the court
is "convinced that Schneider has posted false
messages about ZiaSun on the Silicon Investor
message boards ... Schneider's electronic
postings are also causing damage to ZiaSun."

Such injunctions are unusual in cases where freedom of speech is an issue,
says Blake Bell, a New York attorney who specializes in online securities
cases. "I'm frankly surprised a preliminary injunction was won in this case.
This may be the first case of its kind where that has happened."

Judges generally are reluctant to grant preliminary injunctions because of
concerns about violating First Amendment rights, he says.

Indeed, in her order, Judge Pechman acknowledged that the injunction could
"unduly burden" Mr. Schneider's freedom of speech, but found that the harm
his speech was causing ZiaSun outweighed those concerns.

The case has been closely watched on both Silicon Investor
(www.techstocks.com) and Raging Bull (www.ragingbull.com), two online
stock-chat discussion forums where investors are locked in a heated debate
over ZiaSun.

A number of companies have fought high-profile
legal battles with their online critics. Legal experts
say such cases generally are settled.

"It just doesn't make any sense," says Lyrissa
Lidsky, a professor at the University of Florida
College of Law who has studied so-called cyberlibel cases. "You never see
injunctions like this in defamation cases because it is generally regarded as
prior restraint, and a violation of a constitutional right to freedom of speech."

In her ruling, Judge Pechman noted that "Mr. Schneider has not responded to
ZiaSun's claims that his postings are untruthful, nor has he come forward with
any evidence to support the statements made in his postings."

Mr. Schneider says neither he nor his lawyer appeared in court to contest
ZiaSun's charges. He says he hasn't been following the case.

"I'm going to comply with what the judge says in the order," Mr. Schneider
says. He says he will not post false messages about ZiaSun, but says he's not
about to stop criticizing the company. Mr. Schneider says he plans on posting
new information online in a few days that suggests ZiaSun officials misled
shareholders overseas.

Mr. Schneider continued to criticize ZiaSun on Silicon Investor Tuesday.
ZiaSun spokesman Mark Harris said the company is planning to file a motion
of contempt over the posts. If found in contempt of the court order, Mr.
Schneider could face fines, or be sent to jail.

ZiaSun, based in Solana Beach, Calif., is a holding company for a variety of
Internet-related entities. Its primary holding, Online Investors Advantage,
holds seminars around the country that teach investors sophisticated trading
strategies, such as options trading and how to interpret stock charts to
anticipate market movements. ZiaSun's holdings also include an online
brokerage, called Swiftrade, that specializes in trading for investors outside
the U.S. It also owns a variety of e-commerce sites targeted at Asian
markets.

Until September 1998, ZiaSun was known as BestWay U.S.A., which
marketed a machine that enabled people to bottle their own beverages.

The company reported earnings of about $1.5 million, or five cents per diluted
share, through the first nine months of 1999.

But Mr. Schneider alleges that ZiaSun has used improper accounting to inflate
its earnings, and says that former ZiaSun executives used a brokerage they
controlled to improperly market BestWay shares to overseas investors.

Mr. Harris, the ZiaSun spokesman, denies the company has misled investors.
He acknowledges ZiaSun is "having discussions" with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission regarding its accounting practices, but says the
discussions are "routine."

An SEC spokesman declined to comment on ZiaSun.

Write to Jason Anders at jason.anders@wsj.com and Aaron Elstein at
aaron.elstein@wsj.com



To: SSP who wrote (22225)1/26/2000 1:39:00 AM
From: Investor Clouseau  Respond to of 150070
 
>>>Statisticians
report that days full of uncertainty and
reversals are characteristic of late January. They call
it the "January 23rd effect." <<<

ROTFLOL!!! I am officially predicting the "January 26th effect" for tomorrow!

:)
IC (still LMAO!)