Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MaryinRed who wrote (9716)	1/25/2000 11:59:00 PM
From: bob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18366

Mary ~ You were correct in your assessment of today's interview. Here are some important points from it that I thought were new and important. 1.) AOL/TimeWarner/EMI merger is very good for us because of AOL's vast ability to distribute music over the internet. 2.) We will be supporting TimeWarner/EMI music libraries with whatever codec they choose (EPAC was mentioned the codec of choice for EMI.) 3.) We plan on supporting Sony's ATRAC3 Codec. I really liked the third one. LOL!! There was much more to the interview and should be heard by all interested investors. For instance, Fred mentioned that we are working with the home stereo and auto stereo industries, not just the portable music industries. Fred also spoke of how robust the MicroOS is and that one of our "business partners" compared it to 5 other flash file management systems and proclaimed ours "the best". Sounds like pretty BIG NEWS to me. Bob

To: MaryinRed who wrote (9716)	1/26/2000 12:05:00 AM
From: Jetter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

So would that be an example of how good everyones dd is on edig? "Big... earthshattering news on edig at 2:30.... possible hitachi announcement... possible panasonic announcement...." How many people did you convince to buy in above $20 Mary? All I'm saying is that I think you should use some discretion in what you say. There are people here who for whatever reason, believe you know a lot more than others because you are a big shareholder. Here's a simple question. If this technology is so valuable, why didn't intc or any of the other companies working with edig acquire it? As recent as 3 months ago intc could have had this company for peanuts? Why didn't they? Surely it couldn't be that intc doesn't have the insight to be forward thinking... naw. must have wanted to loose out on a couple billion dollar investment... Peace. P.S. Mary... If you don't understand the simple message I'm trying to converse than sorry. Nothing personal. For your sake I sure hope it all works out. Been there, done that.