Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (89673)	1/26/2000 2:29:00 AM
From: Y. Samuel Arai	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571414

Intel's IA-64 doomed to fail as the i860 did? Interesting article at realworldtech.com Kudos to JC's News for the link. jc-news.com

To: Mani1 who wrote (89673)	1/26/2000 3:05:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571414

Mani, <you did not respond to my post, did you? Go and read my post again.> You are getting way too confrontational. How am I supposed to answer your question? It's obvious that you only want to hear one answer, which isn't the answer I'm going to give. So you can't find many high-speed Pentium III in the retail channel. I'll admit that I don't see too many of them myself. Yet Intel is making and selling a lot of them. And demand is high. My conclusion is that customers are snapping up high-speed Pentium III systems very quickly, which is why we don't see too many on the shelves. You may come to a different conclusion, that Intel is having manufacturing problems. That's up to you to decide. Here's a question for you. If there were fewer Athlons made than Coppermines (1M Athlons vs. "millions" of CuMines in Q4), how come there are so many Athlons available? I would think that since demand is high and supply is low, Athlons would be even harder to come by than those lousy "Floppermines." Am I missing something here? Tenchusatsu