Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (7006)	1/26/2000 1:03:00 PM
From: XBrit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10027

Personally, I have no time for cheerleading or bashing. Once I determined that the Bear Sterns rating is a rogue outlier, I bought a truckload more NITE today at 29 11/16, and that is my final average down. If the previous bottom was 22 on Q earnings of .19, I don't see below 30 as being sustainable on recent earnings of .54 and prospective earnings for 1Q north of .70. At this point it seems to be grossly oversold by any measure I can think of.

To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (7006)	1/26/2000 5:02:00 PM
From: George the Greek	Respond to of 10027

Why do you have to come here and defend NITE? Why have the cheerleaders fallen silent? Dunno. We are all stunned. Today was horrific with the unsavory BS rating of NITE. SFD, your coments ring true and truer, resonate more each day (about management missteps, not stepping up to promoting a grander expression of the company's vision, etc). Where is the corporate PR to put a shiny rose-colored glow on our forward-looking thoughts, especially in light of just announcing a strong quarter? (Exception: KP did a little damage control on the Mon system outage, though, as SFD points out, too late). Where is KP when the stock needs some cheerleading from the corporate management? Why do ANY OF US have to do the cheerleading? KP's responsibility. The buck stops there. George