Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: w molloy who wrote (3670)	1/26/2000 6:10:00 PM
From: Terrapin	Respond to of 5195

Hi w molloy, Thanks for the response. As a first step in following the logic of Renetech's post I felt it was important to clarify that the cited patent was indeed relevant to TDMA. You said: "Terrapin. - This patent was filed in 1985. How do you think it stands up with regard to the prior art, especially regarding DARPA work?" Excellent. The prior art issue now becomes central to the discussion. I cannot say that I know; I am merely trying to keep the debate focused and civil. The prior art issue was apparently what the Motorola case was all about as well. I will have to re-read what Renetech wrote with regard to the outcome of that case for it escapes my memory at the moment. Eventually we will get to the issue of the ERICY case. Ultimately we will get to the issue of revenues derived from these patents. Terrapin