SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cory Gault who wrote (89784)1/26/2000 4:35:00 PM
From: Charles R  Respond to of 1571809
 
Dell says "y2k" and "inconsistant semiconductor flow"



To: Cory Gault who wrote (89784)1/26/2000 5:11:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1571809
 
Believe what you want Ted. I love the way you refer to "Intel longs" as some streotyped group of people.

Now this is getting really stupid.....would you rather I called them Intellabees, or Intel-Americans?!!

I guess I could point out your subjectivity in regards to Intel and it's stock movement way back. Shouldn't we be trading at $50 based on your posts back in October/November.

Now you know this is bull; I know I am not clairvoyant and have never claimed to be. So when I speculate on future stock prices, I am careful to point that its a possibility and that I base it on the trends at the time and then extend forward. I said one very real possibility was a $50 stock should the downtrend at the time continue and if Intel failed to make its earnings. That was not a bias...that was a very real possibility.


I try to make objective decisions where to put my money based on information/experiences, not emotions...it's worked pretty good so far.

From your posts it sounds like you have been very successful. But that was not my point. What I said was that at least some of your posts reflect a bias....that your comments re AMD tend to fall on the negative side. It took your last post re corporate sales to cause me to react.

ted