SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (4350)1/26/2000 5:38:00 PM
From: Lucretius  Respond to of 42523
 
LOL... i'm gonna avoid them till this evening... no reason to point and laugh at the morons who chose to remain on the "unsinkable" Titanic as you sail away in an aircraft carrier; the water is cold enough for them as it is (BG)



To: MythMan who wrote (4350)1/26/2000 6:38:00 PM
From: eddie r gammon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
Did you see these?
Read 206.253.196.27
Then 206.253.196.27
ROTFLMAO

erg



To: MythMan who wrote (4350)1/26/2000 7:48:00 PM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
re- QCOM.... Still, Payne was encouraged that "everyone is trying to spin [the news] as a near-term event," adding "I don't think the party is over yet. I don't see any real panicking."

The oft-bullish strategist observed that "other stocks were able the take the rally baton" from Qualcomm, but he conceded the market's "main problem is the pool of winners continues to get smaller -- that's not good."

HO HO HO HO


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News