SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (89846)1/26/2000 8:21:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573941
 
RE:"But something is wrong if DELL did not get the "high end" he wanted."...

Clearly, if Dell didn't get enough, there weren't enough...
Back to the dumpster behind the Intel FAB theory. <G>

Jim



To: steve harris who wrote (89846)1/26/2000 8:27:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573941
 
Re: "iNtEL was making x number of chips. Then they had to start "ramping" floppermines, losing previous production. "

Stevie Blunder, still can't count? Intel shipped a record 31.9 million processors in Q4. That's not losing previous production unless you can't tell the difference between greater volume and lower volume. 31.9 Million is more volume Stevie, not less. More means MORE, not less. Ask a grownup to explain it to you.

EP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News