Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (89857)	1/26/2000 9:35:00 PM
From: milo_morai	Respond to of 1572391

LMAO!!! Thanx Dan3!!! Milo (eom)

To: Dan3 who wrote (89857)	1/26/2000 9:49:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Respond to of 1572391

Dan3 - <PB and others like him did their jobs well, and produced as many or more high speed coppermines as were forecasted to be needed. How were they to know that the vaunted Intel "paranoid" top management was too busy prancing around the "dot com for sale" mall to be bothered with the boring old CPU business.> I believe the biggest factor in what is apparent in the supply situation stems for the original .18 / Coppermine delay disclosed last June. As I have posted recently, it will probably take until the end of Intel's Q1 to fully recover from the effects that snowballed from that event. On top of that, high end demand was higher than forecasted earlier in the year. IT is very frustrating that the effects of the incident that was fixed seemingly so long ago, is still having such a powerful effect. A pretty potent lesson. And yes, I'm frustrated. PB