SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Y2k_fan who wrote (6373)1/26/2000 9:31:00 PM
From: LiPolymer  Respond to of 10293
 
Y2k_fan-man, you're of course free to do what you want. I'm still learning more about the market all the time, but one thing seems certain: Keep the emotions out of the equation. IMO you're not sounding too objective. Maybe you're already short before today?

C'mon the batteries don't explode. Check the tech, man, Valence uses manganese, not cobalt.

VLNC and YHOO, there's a meaningful comparison <g>. But let's just run with that for a minute. YHOO PSR is about 155, VLNC PSR is about 40. And your point is...?

I don't know how the $600 target was justified for YHOO, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see CIBC is right in line with their analysis on VLNC.

FMK may have had some irrational exuberance, but as it is turning out he was more right than wrong.

Regards,
Gary Smith



To: Y2k_fan who wrote (6373)1/26/2000 10:52:00 PM
From: golden_tee   Respond to of 10293
 
Good luck. Expect to get steamrolled as the pending contracts are announced. VLNC and fraud will never be mentioned in the same sentence (outside of wexliars pound, that is) I see, hard to believe myself, a $37 peak in THIS cycle. Maybe you should save your pennies for that point, no?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News