Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (89875)	1/26/2000 10:12:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Respond to of 1572452

Kenith - <But Elmo sez Intel shipped a record number of processors. How's that fit into the supply constrain theory? > They did. You obviously don't know jack about supply constraint theory. Although Intel shipped a record number of processors, there is demand for more. Surely you can grasp this concept. Sheesh. <Maybe the notch gate is not as good as Intel had bragged. > No Kenith, it's real good, from a device engineering stand point. And there are no yiled issues associated with the process. <Intel top brass decided to play chick and end up tons of low speeds. Obviously the yields are good if one is to aim very low (center of distribution).> Believe what you want to believe. I've posted my position. You say an idiot statement like how does shipping record processors and still not meet demand conform to supply constraint theory...yeah, believe what you want to believe. BTW, I'm not saying being supply constrained doesn't suck. PB