Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (64711)	1/27/2000 12:01:00 PM
From: limtex	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

JWillie- I couldn't help but wonder what the result of a "bad crossover" might translate to in terms of stock price. Would this 'crossover' be affected in any way if for instance any of the great announcements we are awaiting actually happened? Best regards, L

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (64711)	1/27/2000 12:48:00 PM
From: bdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

<<I wonder if Jacobs wanted to set some mgmt stock option prices at lower levels??? could be, was rumored last September also>> I don;?t think so JW, not his style <<to all who cannot tolerate TA fallibility,inability to forewarn of every single decline, predict every single turn, anticipate every single detail in the earnings report, expect every mishandled PR element in the concall, I apologize>> No need to apologize to me. I appreciate that you reference your predictions to some external referent other than angels, the music of the spheres or your own inscrutable prescience. I don?t have a clue about TA, astrology or tarot but find some of the ideas generated interesting and worth throwing into the hopper with the rest of the buzz. Buck up everyone. The Q is now in stronger hands. One of these days there will be an announcement the rest of the street can interpret correctly.