SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (114)1/27/2000 4:06:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 12465
 
The injunction specifically prohibits Mr. Schneider from posting false statements about ZiaSun or
its officers and employees, including false allegations that any are criminals or "crims"; false
statements suggesting fraudulent activity or dishonest conduct by ZiaSun or its officers and
employees; false statements about government investigations into ZiaSun; or implying
undisclosed facts about these matters.


Since there's been no trial, how does the court expect to make these determinations? What if Floydie's right?

This is prior restraint; it's muzzling of dissent. It sucks. Yes, I'd have preferred that Floydie be a bit more circumspect in his accusations, but this really goes too far.

I hope he appeals. He owes it to all of us, IMO.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (114)1/27/2000 4:17:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Re: Net Firm Wins First Round In Battle With Online Critic

January 25, 2000

Heard on the Net

Net Firm Wins First Round
In Battle With Online Critic

By AARON ELSTEIN and JASON ANDERS
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL INTERACTIVE EDITION

A small Internet company has won an unusual early victory in its continuing efforts to silence a critic who has slammed the firm in hundreds of online message-board posts.

ZiaSun Technologies won a preliminary injunction against Floyd Schneider, a Saddle River, N.J., mortgage banker who uses the online aliases "TheTruthseeker" and "Flodyie." Mr. Schneider has been a vocal critic of ZiaSun and its management, and the injunction bars him from referring to
ZiaSun's officers as "criminals," and from posting false statements alleging criminal activities by the company.

In June 1999, ZiaSun sued Mr. Schneider and seven other message-board users in U.S. District Court in Seattle, alleging that they engaged in a "cybersmear" campaign to ruin the company. The case is expected to proceed to trial later this year. Mr. Schneider maintains that he has reported only the truth about a company that he believes has defrauded investors.

In her ruling on the preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Marsha J. Pechman said the court is "convinced that Schneider has posted false messages about ZiaSun on the Silicon Investor message boards ... Schneider's electronic
postings are also causing damage to ZiaSun."

Such injunctions are unusual in cases where freedom of speech is an issue, says Blake Bell, a New York attorney who specializes in online securities cases. "I'm frankly surprised a preliminary injunction was won in this case. This may be the first case of its kind where that has happened."

Judges generally are reluctant to grant preliminary injunctions because of concerns about violating First Amendment rights, he says.

Indeed, in her order, Judge Pechman acknowledged that the injunction could "unduly burden" Mr. Schneider's freedom of speech, but found that the harm his speech was causing ZiaSun outweighed those concerns.

The case has been closely watched on both Silicon Investor
(www.techstocks.com) and Raging Bull (www.ragingbull.com), two online stock-chat discussion forums where investors are locked in a heated debate over ZiaSun.

A number of companies have fought high-profile legal battles with their online critics. Legal experts say such cases generally are settled.

"It just doesn't make any sense," says Lyrissa Lidsky, a professor at the University of Florida College of Law who has studied so-called cyberlibel cases. "You never see
injunctions like this in defamation cases because it is generally regarded as prior restraint, and a violation of a constitutional right to freedom of speech."

In her ruling, Judge Pechman noted that "Mr. Schneider has not responded to ZiaSun's claims that his postings are untruthful, nor has he come forward with any evidence to support the statements made in his postings."

Mr. Schneider says neither he nor his lawyer appeared in court to contest ZiaSun's charges. He says he hasn't been following the case.

"I'm going to comply with what the judge says in the order," Mr. Schneider says. He says he will not post false messages about ZiaSun, but says he's not about to stop criticizing the company. Mr. Schneider says he plans on posting new information online in a few days that suggests ZiaSun officials misled shareholders overseas.

Mr. Schneider continued to criticize ZiaSun on Silicon Investor Tuesday. ZiaSun spokesman Mark Harris said the company is planning to file a motion of contempt over the posts. If found in contempt of the court order, Mr. Schneider could face fines, or be sent to jail.

ZiaSun, based in Solana Beach, Calif., is a holding company for a variety of Internet-related entities. Its primary holding, Online Investors Advantage, holds seminars around the country that teach investors sophisticated trading
strategies, such as options trading and how to interpret stock charts to anticipate market movements. ZiaSun's holdings also include an online brokerage, called Swiftrade, that specializes in trading for investors outside
the U.S. It also owns a variety of e-commerce sites targeted at Asian markets.

Until September 1998, ZiaSun was known as BestWay U.S.A., which marketed a machine that enabled people to bottle their own beverages.

The company reported earnings of about $1.5 million, or five cents per diluted share, through the first nine months of 1999.

But Mr. Schneider alleges that ZiaSun has used improper accounting to inflate its earnings, and says that former ZiaSun executives used a brokerage they controlled to improperly market BestWay shares to overseas investors.

Mr. Harris, the ZiaSun spokesman, denies the company has misled investors. He acknowledges ZiaSun is "having discussions" with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its accounting practices, but says the
discussions are "routine."

An SEC spokesman declined to comment on ZiaSun.

Write to Jason Anders at jason.anders@wsj.com and Aaron Elstein at aaron.elstein@wsj.com

interactive.wsj.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (114)1/28/2000 3:28:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
The real ZiaSun Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 19, 1996, under the name "Carlisle Enterprises, yet it was an IPO 2 million shares exclusively at International Assets Management in 1997. fortunecity.com. Amazing, simply amazing. The folowing is from ziasuns SEC filed 10sb;

Item 1. Description of Business

(a) Business Development

ZiaSun Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") was organized under the laws of
the State of Nevada on March 19, 1996, under the name "Carlisle Enterprises,
Inc." The Company was incorporated for the purpose of executive search and
recruitment of employees for businesses. The Company was initially authorized to
issue a total of 50,000,000 shares of common stock having a par value of $0.001
per share. A copy of the Company's initial Articles of Incorporation are
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. See the Exhibit Index,
Part III.

All shares set forth in this registration statement have been restated to
reflect (i) the 1-for-2 reverse split of the issued and outstanding common stock
of the Company which became effect September 10, 1998, and (ii) the 2-for-1
forward stock split of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company
which became effective May 14, 1999.

At the Company's inception, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance
of 50,000 "unregistered" and "restricted" (post split adjusted) shares of its
common stock at a price of $0.10 per share to Jennifer C. McMinn, a former
executive officer of the Company.

Following the Company's incorporation, the Company, pursuant to an
exemption provided by Rule 504 of Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"), offered and sold an aggregate total of
750,000 (post split adjusted) shares of its common stock to approximately 50
non-U.S. investors at a price of $0.10 per share. The offering was completed
with the Company receiving aggregate proceeds of $75,000 before payment of
legal, accounting and printing expenses. On April 9, 1996, the Company's common
stock became quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol "CLEP."
Following completion of this offering, the Company initially evaluated acquiring
exclusive North American distribution rights for beverage centers and other
products of Fountain Fresh International ("FFI"), a Utah corporation.

On January 6, 1997 the Company sold 5,000,000 (post split adjusted)
restricted shares of its common stock pursuant to Regulation S of the 1933 Act
to several non-U.S. foreign corporations, at a price of $0.10 per share, for
total cash consideration to the Company of $500,000.

On February 3, 1997, the Company sold 10,000,000 (post split adjusted)
restricted shares of its common stock pursuant to the exemption from
registration provided by Regulation S and Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act, to
several non-U.S. foreign corporations, at a price of $0.10 per share, for total
cash consideration to the Company of $1,000,000.

On April 17, 1997, the Company acquired all right, title and interest of
Katori Consultants, Ltd. ("Katori"), of that certain License Agreement between
Katori and FFI. Under the terms of that License Agreement, the Company, as the
Licensee acquired the exclusive USA distribution rights for the beverage centers
and other products of FFI. In exchange for these distribution rights, the
Company agreed to pay a total of $5,000,000 in annual payments through the year
2016, with a $15,000 royalty fee for the first year and a $30,000 royalty fee
for the second year. Copies of that License Agreement and Assignment of License
Agreement are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. See the
Exhibit Index, Part III.

2
On April 29, 1997 the Board of Directors, in accordance with Section
78.315(2) of the Nevada Revised Statutes, authorized a company name change to
BestWay, USA. A copy of the Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of
Incorporation changing the name of the Company is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. See the Exhibit Index, Part III.

During July 1997, the Company authorized the private placement of 1,000,000
(post split adjusted) shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $2.50
per share. The Company sold a total of 129,994 (post split adjusted) shares and
received $324,984 in cash from this private placement.

On September 2, 1997, the Company qualified to do business in the State of
Utah as a foreign corporation. On October 31, 1997, the Company qualified to do
business in the State of California as a foreign corporation. On September 4,
1998, following written consent of the Company's stockholders and in accordance
with Section 78.320(2) of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the Articles of
Incorporation were amended to: (a) authorize a 1-for-2 reverse split of issued
and outstanding common stock of the Company, and (b) change the name of the
Company to its current name "ZiaSun Technologies, Inc." The reverse split and
name change became effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Amendment of
the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada on September
10, 1998. A copy of the Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of
Incorporation effecting the reverse stock split and name change are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. See the Exhibit Index, Part
III.

During 1998, the Company identified numerous design problems with the
beverage centers manufactured by FFI which would require major redesign before
those beverage centers could be successfully reintroduced into the marketplace.
Accordingly, on October 1, 1998, the Company wrote down the License Agreement
between FFI and the Company from $3,296,234 to its then estimated value of
$50,000, and effectuated a spin-off of the License Agreement to a newly formed,
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company named BestWay Beverages, Inc.
('BestWay"), a Nevada Corporation. Currently BestWay is inactive, pending the
completion of design modifications and successful testing of the new beverage
center now being developed by BEVEX (FFI was renamed BEVEX Inc. in August 1998).

During the last quarter of 1998 and first half of 1999, the Company
undertook several acquisitions and/or mergers to diversify and enter some
technology-based arenas.