SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RocketMan who wrote (5857)1/28/2000 9:26:00 AM
From: Ron M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
Report from the San Diego Union Tribune:


Qualcomm stock falls on warning
of lower sales


By Mike Freeman
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

January 27, 2000

SAN DIEGO -- Recent Wall Street darling Qualcomm Inc.
saw its shares tumble yesterday as investors reacted to the
company's warning of lower chip and phone sales in the
second quarter.

Meanwhile, the noise generated from the plunge in
Qualcomm's stock, which fell more than $24 a share to
close at $124.621/2, nearly drowned out news of its
pending purchase of a small wireless locator company,
SnapTrack Inc., for $1 billion.

Qualcomm officials declined to say how many shares the
company will issue to buy SnapTrack. The deal is
expected to be completed in March.

On Tuesday, after the market closed, Qualcomm reported
record earnings for its first quarter, but it also warned of
lower profits during the pending second quarter because of
parts shortages and seasonal slowdowns.

When trading began yesterday, investors bolted en masse,
with more than six times the average number of shares
changing hands.

The company's share price fell below $120 before
rebounding. Its woes dragged down the technology-heavy
Nasdaq exchange, which fell 97.5 points, or 2.34 percent,
to 4,069.91.

"Anybody who has followed the company for some time
knows that lineality is not something that the company is
known for," said

Ajay Diwan, an analyst with Goldman Sachs, said,
"Basically, they gave some guidance that revenue in
general would be lower than it would be in the December
quarter, and that resulted in a sell-off."

Diwan remained bullish on Qualcomm, which pioneered
code division multiple access technology, or CDMA -- the
foundation of mobile phones.

But two other Wall Street firms downgraded their ratings
for Qualcomm.

Merrill Lynch dropped from "accumulate" to "neutral,"
while Salomon Smith Barney switched from "buy" to
"outperform."

"I think the market overreacted," said Dale Pfau, an analyst
with CIBC World Markets. "But I also feel the market
overreacted to good news in December" when Qualcomm's
stock soared after an analyst boosted its target price to
$1,000 a share. The company has since undergone a
4-for-1 stock split.

While Pfau expects Qualcomm's stock to continue to be
volatile, he maintained a "strong buy" rating for the
company.

Ironically, Qualcomm's losses came the same day that it
announced the buyout of SnapTrack, a 70-employee,
privately held company that's expected to give Qualcomm a
stronger grip on mobile phone technology.

SnapTrack develops software that pinpoints locations of
PCS and cellular phones.

Cell-phone companies see this as a key safety feature, and
the Federal Communications Commission has been pushing
for the technology so 911 operators can find callers during
emergencies. The FCC deadline for providing locator
phones is October 2001.

"There's something like 100,000 cell-phone calls a day to
911," said John Cunningham, a spokesman for SnapTrack.
"Of the 100,000, about 30 to 40 percent don't know where
they are when they make the call."

SnapTrack's software is built into chips in the handset. It
taps into the U.S. government's Global Positioning System,
or GPS, to track wireless phone users. It has nearly 50
patents either issued or in process.

Founded in 1995 by Steve Poizner, SnapTrack will
become a wholly owned subsidiary of Qualcomm. The
company will remain in San Jose, said Christine Trimble,
a Qualcomm spokeswoman.

"They have a very strong patent position in
wireless-assisted GPS," said Trimble. "We're merging
technologies."

Trimble declined to release financial details about the
closely held company. According to The Wall Street
Journal, however, SnapTrack raised about $20 million in
capital to develop its tracking system. Top investors
include Motorola and Texas Instruments, as well as
venture capital firm Benchmark Capital.

While the FCC deadline may be driving locator
technology, analysts say its potential extends well beyond
use in emergencies.

By knowing a cell-phone user's location, companies can
deliver a host of services through cell phones that
customers theoretically would pay for, such as driving
directions and traffic reports. Commercial services could
include package delivery tracking.

In addition, wireless companies would be able to find
where subscribers use their phones, thereby packaging
services based on distance billing.

According to SnapTrack, the estimated market for these
services ranges from $4 billion to $20 billion a year.

"To incorporate that function into (chipsets) that Qualcomm
makes gives them another significant advantage over
anyone out there," said Pfau, the CIBC analyst. "I think it's
a good move that adds to their technology portfolio."

Diwan, the Goldman Sachs analyst, said he didn't think
Qualcomm paid too much for SnapTrack, given the San
Diego company's market capitalization of $82.23 billion.

"Two years ago, a billion dollars was a big deal," he said.
"Now it's not that big a deal."





To: RocketMan who wrote (5857)1/28/2000 9:32:00 AM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
To: Uncle Frank who wrote (16660)
From: JohnG
Friday, Jan 28, 2000 9:28 AM ET
Reply # of 16675

QCOM Strategic Purchase
I think the members of this thread should be sophisticated enough to understand the significance of the QCOM
strategic purchase of Snap Track.
First, why would QCOM spend $1 billion to buy a little privately held 60 employee GPS company called Snap
Track (http://www.snaptrack.com/)up in San Jose. That is $16.66 million per employee and we know that even
the best of engineers con't cost that much. Perhaps then it is the patented intellectual property. I am reminded of
a quote from a famous bank robber of old who, when asked why he robbed banks, said simply that that was
where the money was.

Snap Track offfers QCOM the ability to offer cell phone opperators the opportunity to sell mobile location
specific (possibly interactive advertising) for the first time in human history. Free TV is now the greatest
advertising medium on earth. Everything we watch on TV is paid for by advertisers trying to sell their products.
A little company called Gemstar has us all excited because they will be able to sell advertising over their
programming guide.

Snap track now provides their last generation GPS to no other than NTT DO Co MO in Japan. As you know,
DoCoMo represents a pressure point for CDMA development. DDI and two other cellular companies in Japan
owned mainly by KYO (who just bought the QCOM cell phone mfg facility) and Toyota (a deep pocket
company for sure) are using QCOM's CDMA and have a latest generation CDMA network. Their rival vows to
use W-CDMA provided by NEC and including some NTT intellectual property. But now, NTT will have to
deal with QCOM's suite if CDMA intellectual property which just happens to include all future versions of Snap
Track intellectual property.

Also, the FCC has mandated that all cell phones sold after a certain date will have GPS capability so 911 calls
can be tracked down (and possibly so the privacy of drug dealers can be invaded.

So, what is so special about Snap Track GPS. Those of us who have used GPS know it is line of sight. It
doesn't work inside glass and steel buildings because of signal attinuation or in city concrete canyons because of
attinuatuon and reflection. Well, it turns out that Snap Track's patented CDMA does work in these extreme
situations because it operates well despite signal attinuation and reflections.

So QCOM just bought the only patented, proven GPS that works well where the money is--ie where the
people are--ie in cities and inside large buildings.

Advertising rates are expressed in terms of dollars per hunderd contacted. If advertising can be targeted to
contacts that are more likely to use the product being advertised, then the rates are quite high. If only a small
fraction of the contacts are potential customers, then rates are low. With QCOM's GPS technology, we have
the possibility for the first time ever to target mobile people (the ones litely to spend some money) by location
and by whatever phone number related data base operators are able to accumulate. Thus scuba divers might be
reminded of the sale at the 51st street scuba shop when they are in the area. Local restaurant info can be made
available to cell phone users in the area. Local map info can be made available to cell phone users in the area.
This is very specific and customer useful advertising. As such it should command the highest advertising rates.

Now we see how cell phone operators can make a fortune selling advertising while they continue to sell calling
minutes. All this takes 2.5 or 3G internet data channels and QCOM patented technology. Too bad NTT Do Co
Mo and flat footed AT&T don't have it. But thay do have lots of money to go with their dinasaur characteristics.
They will have two choices:
1) deal with QCOM
2) don't make much money and don't provide user specific free internet info wanted by their customers. Perish
for lack of vision in a fast changing world.

How about free phones with limited free minutes paid for by advertisers and given avay to select customers.
Move over Gemstar. Here comes QCOM.

And what about MOT, NOK and ERICY. Can they survive without this patented QCOM technolgy. They
need to come to mother QCOM to buy their HDR internet user specific advertising enabled ASICS. Come to
mother!! Bring cash. And then you will be able to build the phones that cellular operators demand--the ones that
have a litttle logo that says "Qualcom inside." Thus we have "demand pull" QCOM ASIC sales dictated by the
operators--ie the customers MOT, NOK and ERICY hope to sell phones to.

Now Alex Ceina of SSB can do a 180 after all of Voltaire's "Houses" have a chance to load up on cheap
QCOM stock sold by uninformed investors scared shitless by the recent decline in the QCOM stock price. My
question is, how many of those so called analysts that attended the QCOM conference call have been smart
enough th figure out that I Jacobs was doing their employers a big for when he mentioned that QCOM earnings
would be seasonably flat in Q2. Their employers now have a chance to load up on cheap QCOM stock and sell
it off later.
JohnG



To: RocketMan who wrote (5857)1/30/2000 3:01:00 AM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
Rocketman - From the little reading I did, the cdma network would send a cue to the phone as to where it was, so that the gps software could do a faster fix on the best satellites. But it would still need to get that fix, and anyone using a gps receiver knows how easily the signal is blocked.

Actually there are two separate things that a GPS receiver needs to know from as many different satellites as possible:

1) The satellite's ephemeris (where it is, and how it is moving, for those without rocket in their name)
2) Timing information.

It turns out that the timing information is embedded in the chipping that the GPS CDMA does. This is very repetitive, like a metronome. Anyone ever noticed that it is often possible to sync to the beat of very softly playing music long before you can really distinguish the music itself?

In this analogy (which is actually reasonably accurate technially), the satellite position data is like the music. In order to hear it and decode it the signal has to be pretty strong. But, the cell basestation already knows this information. The cell phone itself doesn't need to 'hear' it. It just gets what it needs (doppler info, ...) from the cell network.

Voila - this system locks up with much less received signal strength and it does so much quicker (it knows where to look for the beat, and what kind of beat to expect) than a standalone GPS receiver. Very, very cool idea.

Clark

PS Note that multipath would, to some degree, throw off a system like this. But typically, the strongest multipath comes from nearby reflections, and thus the error is not likely to be huge.

PPS Somewhat oddly, it turns out that in a past life I knew one of the developers of this system, (although this isn't how I happened on the details of this system). It's a small world.

PPPS I haven't yet looked at the key patent in depth, but at first glance it looks pretty good. There is only one other patent I've seen which is anywhere near as crucial to the whole technique. (Note: In addition, I haven't looked to see how thorough the patent is in locking up the whole solution space. An amazing number of patents are just poorly worked from that perspective.)