To: who cares? who wrote (10239 ) 1/28/2000 10:26:00 AM From: PartyTime Respond to of 18366
No, Mr. Burns. I'm recommending that folks look at the history of the company and match it with its future potential. It's prudent for investors to take note of the past but base an investment on the future, isn't? Well, that's what I'm asking folks to do. But let's look at this a bit. Norris Communications, a Nasdaq stock from '93 to '97, due to losing market share and the consequent drain on earnings, had the wherewithal to recognize it was moving down the wrong path. Thus, it reengineered into a new company with a new focus, changed its name to eDigital and now sports both relevant and futuristic technology. Unfortunate it was, simultaneous to the company's R&D efforts which inhibited it from generating substantial revenues, that Nasdaq strengthened its stringency for listing requirements causing the company to appear on the OTC:BB where we're now seeing trading volatility. But had EDIG not done what it did, IBM never would have invited it to share its booth at the recent CES Convention in Los Vegas, where we saw things like Microsoft showing what the future home will look like...and much, much more. Nor would IBM have opted to use EDIG technology in its own futuristic products. IBM did some reengineering itself, didn't it? So why not eDigital? Mr. Burns, are you telling us you don't find any value for a company to embark on long-term research and development in order to reshape its future? And given eDigital is developing Internet-related products don't you think the company will derive inherent benefits from this sector? Or would you rather eDigital have remained Norris Communications and continued selling dictation equipment? Get up to date, buddy! Buy some EDIG!!! Invest in the future, not the past. Invest prospectively and get a greater overall return. I'm not telling anybody anything different than what I just told you. Let's be real here. There's only one reason to account for your obvious prejudice, to the point where you've offered up technical distortive type posts: your short position. By now, this is well established. What more need I write?