Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Silicon Investor ThinkTank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BryanB who wrote (689)	1/28/2000 12:05:00 PM
From: IEarnedIt	Respond to of 3372

Bryan, my read messages are still not changing colors even if I click on them One at a time. Is this being looked in to??? It adds allot of extra time searching threads just to see where you last left off. TIA :-) JD

To: BryanB who wrote (689)	1/28/2000 1:15:00 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Respond to of 3372

Bryan, At the bottom of this page on Classic SI, there is a link to archived/inactive threads. techstocks.com There is no such link that I am able to find on this page in the New SI. siliconinvestor.com Additionally, some forums, such as The Coffee Shop, have links to other websites, labeled "Hot Links." techstocks.com These hot links seem to be missing from the new SI. siliconinvestor.com Holly

To: BryanB who wrote (689)	1/28/2000 11:25:00 PM
From: John F.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3372

Re Full Text Search of Archives: Bryan, Does SI have any plans to someday allow us to do a full text search of the archives (say going back a year or more)? Right now full text searches only go back 3 months. SI has tons of great information posted on a wide variety of topics. I find the search extremely useful .. but not nearly as useful as it could be due to the the 3 month limitation. Right now I am trying to decide whether to go with DSL or Cable Modem for my home. A search on DSL + Cable returned a lot of useful information .. but I am sure there is a ton more in older posts. Thank you for your time and consideration. John

To: BryanB who wrote (689)	1/30/2000 12:59:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 3372

Bryan, wish I could have given you my impressions of the broadcast. Sorry, to say I missed it. Something "Urgent and important" came up at work! Another "think tank" suggestion... When you peopleMark a person because you think that individual gives you valuable information in a particular area. It would be nice if you could add a comment next to their name. For Example, If I people marked you, and some day in the future you changed your profile and removed the fact that you are Director of SI. I might add "Managing Director of SI". For others I might say, "Really knows the Networking sector". In this way, when a particularly though question comes up regarding a technology related to a stock, I could scan down my PeopleMarks, find the person I believe is most qualified to answer and drop them a note. Michael