To: Steve Lee who wrote (26907 ) 1/28/2000 12:46:00 PM From: QwikSand Respond to of 64865
Solaris on Intel has been essentially free for over a year. The short answer to your question is based on two facts: a) The server market is growing so fast, and has so many segments, that the demand for both Intel and Sun servers will continue to grow rapidly for the forseeable future. b) In servers, Sun and Intel target different segments and are likely to do so for at least the next two years. Intel machines are growing "ever more powerful", but are confined to low- and mid-range 32-bit servers until IA64 proves itself viable. In a recent exchange on this thread between myself, twister and Tony Viola, I said IA64, which is talked about as though it's already a done deal, is in fact a high-risk project that is just beginning to come on line and certainly can't threaten Sun's market share for at least two years. Tony replied "Doesn't backing from all these companies for IA64 guarantee it's success?" Twister replied "Sure!", since twister replies "Sure!" to all questions of the form "Doesn't X guarantee Wintel's success?". My answer is that because of Intel's recent inability to deliver even on the latest iteration of its existing 32-bit chip, its captives are now looking for alternatives and AMD is looking like a better investment. That long list of IA64 backers will do the same, in a hurry, if IA64 encounters too many bumps in the road, which it might well do (it is definitely too early to tell). Some, like Siemens and Fujitsu, have already done so, remarking that IA64 won't be enterprise-ready soon enough. Until both IA64 and a 64-bit version of Microsoft Windows have established themselves in the market, which, as I've said, is not less than 2 years off, your "short" SUNW position with puts establishes you as a trader playing blips in a graph, not an investor playing a long-term trend. Traders either get lucky or don't. If you had been short SUNW 2 weeks ago you would be doing quite well. Solaris on Intel? I doubt it will be much of an issue, but if it does take off, then what you do is buy more SUNW. It means Sun will be in more accounts, talking to more customer, selling them more "kit" and services and storage, and large machines whose power the 32-bit Intel boxes can't equal, regardless of whether Solaris confers some measure of stability on them. I don't claim Sun is without challenges; they are principally execution challenges under their own control. They must get their new generation of UltraSparc 3 based computers out (and as previous messages have discussed, it doesn't matter that SPARC does fewer whetstones than Alpha & co.), must finish crafting the software that will cement their position as the dominant enterprise supplier of 1-stop-shopping e-business solutions, must do more to build and otherwise assist the spread of Sun-branded appliances. IMHO the game is Sun's to lose. Their valuation is out of traditional bounds because they are one of a handful of companies that occupy a unique position as a leading new-economy infrastructure supplier (along with CSCO, EMC, & a few others). Neither M$FT nor INTC are in that position. Why EVERYBODY should have a long term position in Intel is a total mystery to me.<g> Regards, --QwikSand