Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (16569)	1/28/2000 1:37:00 PM
From: Lost1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 63513

Evil and suppressive men have been hiding behind religion for centuries...IMO, of course

To: Carolyn who wrote (16569)	1/28/2000 2:02:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63513

Trying to figure out crazy people will give you a headache. Put on some Tito Puente instead. (just MHO) amazon.com

To: Carolyn who wrote (16569)	1/28/2000 2:26:00 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 63513

<<These societies are male dominated and all sorts of abuse and inequities are forced on females.>> Where there is any abuse, of course it should be combated, just I don't know if all polagamists are abusive. Just as I don't know if they all abuse the welfare system, but I don't think they deserve welfare support of their lifestyle choice or should defraud the system. Really I've never met a member of a polygamous relationship, have you? If a relationship is good for all involved, I'm not sure the government should be involved. If any relationship is abusive, or destructive of freedom, the government has an obligation to protect those who need protection just as in every other situation. I really had no idea there were that many involved, did you?