Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (87935)	1/28/2000 3:26:00 PM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90042

BE, lets not waste anymore bandwith...say have you ever looked at CTV?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (87935)	1/28/2000 4:33:00 PM
From: Ronaldo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90042

Bald Eagle: I am not in Tim's private room but probably could go there if I wanted, I think that I am in good terms with Tim. I can only tell you that I was never asked not to post and I doubt very much Tim would ask something like that from his aquaintances. IMHO you and Jake have taken over the thread on the principle that it is not "property" of Tim Luke but property of GNET or SI and that, therefore, you can post wherever you want. You guys did not have the courage to start a new thread but thought that there was some sort of audience, emotional capital, inertia, click$, what-have-you, related to this thread (which, IMHO, there was and was a merit of Tim Luke, not merit of SI, SI-Bob or you). Now you have discovered that the thread is quasi dead and, LOL, your deduction is that it is Tim Luke's fault! It seems as if your logic goes like this: "when this thread rocked it was not Tim Luke's merit, now that it tanks it is Tim Luke's fault/conspiracy". I think Tim Luke can be thankful at you and Jake for managing such a savage contrast for the "before and after" of this thread. I can only hope you can start your thread, on your terms, and that you are successful at it. R

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (87935)	1/28/2000 10:11:00 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90042

I was thinking the same thing>>> thats what you get for thinking.....we are too busy making money in "our" "private" room to bother with this dead thread. toodles

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (87935)	1/28/2000 11:44:00 PM
From: Riley	Respond to of 90042

I'm sorry you guys (Bald Eagle, Jake) feel the way you do...this has been a great thread, but it does appear to be dying to me. I am in the "private room" as well as other private sites. The "room" is functioning as well or better than we ever did here on SI...Real time information is invaluable to me. If you are not a member or don't want to be a member, that is your business...There are lots of good informational sites available with or without fees...But IMHO the wicked thread has seen it's best days and now we all need to move on....I, personally would like to be a part of a new thread as well as Tim's site and don't forget about Glenn. There is alot of great analysis at www.thewallstreetinvestor.com I wish all the best for those here and hope to continue to post here as well as various sites.....