To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (3943 ) 2/12/2000 6:01:00 PM From: Jong Hyun Yoo Respond to of 5867
Hi, Cary. Sorry for the late response. I have been quite busy with the school work and have not been in the thread lately. You have raised a couple of questions some time ago with respect to 1) possible peak earning in the current cycle 2) justification behind my assumption of PE 32 when historically in the last cycle, equipment companies had PE of low 20's.. So here goes my humble opinions: First, with respect to peak earning in the current cycle, I believe that the upturn in the semiconductor business will last till year 2004 or 2005. Historically, the cycle had a periodicity of about 5 years. Considering current upturn began in early part of the year 1999, forecast of 2004 as a peak year for the upturn is consistent with the historical trend. However, we cannot rule out the fact that the upturn could last beyond this estimate. I believe this upturn is fundamentally different from the previous ones. In previous up cycles, emergence of roughly one product was a main driver for the increase demand in comsumption of semiconductor. For instance, in the last upturn ,which lasted till 1995-1996, the emergence of PC as a common household product created demand for the semiconductor. In anticipation of increased demand in PC, DRAM, microprocessor, and PC peripheral chip companies ramp up the production volume and when the PC consumption did not turn out to be as strong as forecasted in 1996 and demand even tailed off due to depressed economy conditions in Asia, the demand for the ships took a nose dive and severe downturn in the semiconductor and equipment market resulted. What is fundamentally different about the current up cycle is the fact that demand for the semiconductor is created by the emergence of multiple products. The semiconductor products that is related to deployment of the internet infastructure, wireless communications, new consumer electronics such as HDTV, MP3 players, DVD players, ect and web appliances are simultaneously driving the demand for the chips. Since deployment of the internet structure is not going to be over in a couple of years, this upturn has a good possibility of lasting beyond 2003-2004. Even if the demand in one segment of the business softens, the demand in the other area can pick up the slack so that overall demand may continue to go up for sometime. Given this favorable business climate, semiconductor equipment business will continue to thrive. Despite recent raise in the estimate of EPS for LRCX, I believe that there continues to be upside potential. If LRCX is successful in snatching away some market share from AMAT and TEL, given the tremendous operating leverage that LRCX has, LRCX can achieve EPS of more than $5 by just returning to peak revenue level it has reached during the last up cycle, 1.2 billion. During the current upturn, I believe LRCX can reach revenue number exceeding 2.2 billion without increasing manufacturing floor space. Improved operational and manufacturing efficiencies can enable LRCX to achieve EPS of $9 to even $10 sometime in this up cycle. In the near term, there are many expansion plans by major chip makers to add capacity ( INTEL, Motorola, Samsung, Hyundai, and Of course, Taiwanese foundaries). The expansion plan is to meet the current existing demand, not to meet the anticipated demand in the future. Thus, supply and demand equation remains very favorable. The situation is still demand-driven. Added capacity at 0.18 um level and new technological driver such as copper and low-K will create need for more equipments. This will be coupled with transition to 300 mm standard late this yr. The situation is indeed bullish at least for now. The question of appropriate PE to value the stock should depend on the business condition. If you look at the last peak, equipment companies were receiving a multiple of about mid twenties. AMAT, a leader in the industry, were value a little bit higher towards high twenties in 96 just before the market took a nose dive based on next year's expected earning. I am contending that LRCX still does not have the multiple that AMAT is getting but will so as LRCX will operational performance that is comparable to AMAT. Also current industry condition and outlook is much more promising than those in the past cycle so that a little bit upward revised PE of low thirties are quite reasonable. LRCX is a company with tremendous EPS growth potential. When market awards the company with a little bit more aggressive multiple as the company will demonstrate its success in improving operational and manufacturing efficiencies, you will continue to see LRCX soar to new high's. In my opinion, LRCX is undervalued at the current level compared to AMAT based on EPS growth outlook. Good luck to all the longs here.