SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Clarke who wrote (9795)1/29/2000 10:03:00 AM
From: LauA  Respond to of 78476
 
Jim - you misunderstand. I'm not much interested in the fact that YOU were wrong. I consider you a smart, diligent guy. I figure that when YOU make a mistake, I should go to school and find out WHY, so I can avoid the same one. I'm much less interested in WHAT you do, I'm much more interested in WHY you do it. Having been schooled in an environment wherein it is accepted that if you don't make mistakes, you haven't been working - airing mistakes and dissecting them is all part of the learning process. (The corollaries to 'airing' such errors is that there is NO pejorative taint, but you aren't allowed to make the same mistake twice.) Mike might recognize this device as an M+M, Complications Conference, or QA.

Lau



To: James Clarke who wrote (9795)1/29/2000 2:09:00 PM
From: Madharry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78476
 
IMHO this is a dip and over the weekend people will come to their senses that there still is not a real good reason to buy bonds. So they can put the money in cash ,reits, real estate or stocks. Most of the people in technology stocks are not of retirement yet age and so far buying the dips and being completely invested has been a winning strategy. I don't see anyone rushing for the exit yet just MMs knocking down the prices, in the absence of buyers. SNH and CMH sure look tempting though. As for QCOM, I do not own it but a lot of very smart people do, and QCOM is not going out of business any time soon.



To: James Clarke who wrote (9795)2/1/2000 10:52:00 PM
From: Daniel Chisholm  Respond to of 78476
 
Re: USU,

[snip] The fact that the product is a commodity whose price could fall - and it did, and that their costs are fixed.

What's the commodity product you mean, the price of uranium (which I understand to be incidental to their core business, and only affects the price they realize in selling down their stockpile), or their uranium enrichment services (i.e., the "refining margin")?

- Daniel