Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (90393)	1/31/2000 9:28:00 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574446

Re: "So my discussions with you going back to last summer, where you kept prognosticating 800, 866, 933, 1000...in retrospect, you don't find these encounters enlightening?" Enlightening?? Sorry, but no. Please see: Message 11829009 800MHz estimation was based on 1.5V and device designs of Dec 98 IEDM paper. 933MHz estimation was based on actual 1.65V release and 10% improved device design (notch process) of Dec 99 IEDM paper. I still questioned 1GHz but agreed based on some physical analysis I saw on a 733MHz part. This seems very consistent to me and maybe rates more than just a prognostication. I must agree with Kap on at least one point. The DETAILS do seem to elude you. Re: "Maybe this "shill" functions at least in part to counter FUD and opinion such as yours, albeit, without divulging NDA covered material. You'll need to find other sources for that. In fact, I believe you probably tried this at least once. Just guessing, judging by a very interesting post you once made." Now, who's spreading the FUD? Say hello to CHUCKIE for me. Tell him his old office mate retires in Feb. Re: "BTW, I enjoy your technical contributions to the threads." Thanks - I would enjoy yours a lot more if you shot from the hip a bit more often. You lose a toe now and then, but it makes life a lot more entertaining. THE WATSONYOUTH