SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gdichaz who wrote (5895)1/29/2000 7:54:00 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
Chaz,

Please pardon if this has been posted prior (also sorry no link)

SUPPLIERS FACE OBSTACLES IN ROLL OUT OF 3G WIRELESS SYSTEMS

By Darrell Dunn and Mark LaPedus - Electronic Buyers' News (01/14/00)

Suppliers have begun debuting chipsets that support third-generation (3G) wireless technology, which promises to pave the way for a new breed of handheld devices.

But a host of problems, including confusing standards and technical snafus, could push out mass deployment of 3G wireless services from early next year, as previously promised, until as late as 2005, industry observers said. The delays could leave chip makers, OEMs, and carriers on the 3G runway for many years.

Still, suppliers have been busy readying devices for the market.

Qualcomm Inc., for one, is quietly sampling the world's first chipset for 3G networks, while Texas Instruments Inc. has garnered another design win for its 3G-chip platform, this time from Ericsson Inc. The chipset is a critical component that handles voice-processing and other functions in a handset.

A chief benefit of 3G technology is the ability to unify existing cellular standards-CDMA, GSM, and TDMA-under one umbrella. In addition, 3G technology will boost wireless-data rates from the current level of 9.6 Kbit/s up to 2 Mbit/s, enabling a new class of Internet-access devices.

But a major question remains: When will the 3G market actually materialize?

Analyst Will Strauss of Forward Concepts Co., Tempe, Ariz., estimated that a 3G rollout will begin in Japan late next year. 3G will not be a significant factor in the United States until at least 2003, followed by Europe a year or two later, he said.

“Quite frankly, people were originally thinking that 3G cellular was going to hit in Europe by 2002, and now it's looking like it's going to be more like 2005,” Strauss said.

Even in Japan, 3G is being deployed in increments. NTT, the carrier in charge of 3G in Japan, will offer these services by 2001, but it will only offer 64-Kbit/s wireless-data services, not the 2-Mbit/s that was previously promised, analysts said.

One of the biggest stumbling blocks in implementing the technology has been a battle over 3G standards. There are currently three confusing, and incompatible, protocols: cdma2000, Wideband-CDMA (W-CDMA), and a TDMA-like derivative. And a migration path from current digital cellular standards to the more complex 3G protocols remains daunting.

Another hurdle for 3G is competition from general packet radio system (GPRS), a technology that transports wireless data over a GSM network at speeds up to 115 Kbits/s.

“GPRS does about 90% of what most people had originally envisioned 3G was supposed to do,” Strauss said. “And while GPRS is fulfilling a considerable amount of what 3G is supposed to do, it can be done with only slight modifications of the existing infrastructure, while 3G requires a huge investment.”

Another problem is the migration path from two of the current standards, GSM and TDMA, to the more complex W-CDMA technology, according to Johan Lodenius, vice president of marketing at Qualcomm's CDMA Technologies Division in San Diego.

“It's going to be difficult for the TDMA and GSM camps to migrate to W-CDMA because the [various protocols] are completely different,” Lodenius said.

Qualcomm believes it has an advantage over W-CDMA with a competing but proprietary 3G technology called cdma2000. In fact, cdma2000 is a seamless upgrade path from the current CDMA technology, cdmaOne, he said.

Qualcomm said it is shipping the world's first 3G-based chipset, a cdma2000-based solution. Dubbed the MSM5000, the chipset supports wireless-data rates of 153.6 Kbits/s. Later, it will support Qualcomm's own proprietary wireless-data technology, High Data Rate (HDR), which supports 2.4-Mbit/s applications.

TI's efforts to maintain a dominant position as a supplier of processors for use in cellular telephones gained momentum last week with an announcement that Ericsson has selected TI's Open Multimedia Application Platform for use in its 3G systems. That announcement follows a similar one last May, when Nokia said it would use the TI OMAP in its 3G equipment.

Neither Ericsson nor Nokia has disclosed a timetable for the rollout of its 3G handsets, but both will use the OMAP from TI, which consists of an as yet undisclosed ARM-based microprocessor, a TMS320C54x-based DSP, DMA, memories, and customer-specific hardware blocks.

“This platform will enable enhanced wireless Internet applications and access of everything from voice, data, and video to functions that include digital e-commerce and real-time audio and video streaming,” said Bob Carl, manager of marketing for the Americas at TI's wireless-communications division.

Others are also gearing up 3G chipsets, including LSI Logic, Philips, and DSP Communications, a subsidiary of Intel Corp.

<< eom >>

- Eric -



To: gdichaz who wrote (5895)1/31/2000 9:35:00 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
Chaz,

<< And as recently as this week the trials of WCDMA by DoCoMo in Korea required a "van" to transport the "terminal" - again if I read right >>

Heck Chaz, we are after all talking about testing cdma in a mobile environment and multimedia so MOVING vehichles are used (test vehicles & vehicle-mounted MS that move around experimental areas). I suppose a motorcycle could be used but there is generally a fair amount of equipment in those vans:

cdg.org

(make sure you "View graphic version" as well as text of the slide)

The full set of slides starts here:

cdg.org

(make sure you "View graphic version" as well as text of the slides)

Since we kind of crossed over threads I am copying below the rest of my original response to your NTT DoCoMo questions from the smart card thread as you requested (I think <g>:

To: gdichaz (114 ) From: Eric L. Saturday, Jan 29 2000 6:49PM ET

Hi Chaz,

Re: My post # 113 - Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) or R-UIM in CDMA lingo

<< I suggest you copy and post on the Q SP 500 thread. Seems like the Q folks should know that there is a CDMA smart card "standard" in process >>

I will do that Chaz (perhaps a bit cleaned up), although I am not quite ready to do so yet, because I am trying to reverify all the things I think I know, with public information, so I don't post anything that is misleading, or downright inaccurate.

I've been driving myself bonkers for the last few weeks drilling down on the reorganized CDG, ETSI, 3GPP, 3GPP2, UWCC, UMTS Forum threads. None are particularly easy to navigate and there are of course protected and semiprotected areas of each. I'm just about done. TBH, I'd rather be golfing, but snow prohibits. <g>

<< Did I read that correctly - i.e. that the format is for all technologies GSM, TDMA and CDMA? >>

Yes. It appears that is the case. I have some pretty good documentation to post on this relatively shortly. Standard in GSM, optional in others (at least for 2G/2.5G. My opinion is that it will be standard in all 3G flavors, but perhaps it will only be standard in those 3G flavors based on the GSM core network.

<< Also on Japan >>

You Asiacentric individual you. <g>

<< DoCoMo is particularly fascinating to me as it seems to have a huge and effective FUD operation (using the Wall Street Journal in particular) reminds me of a Eurocentric operation which is burned in my memory >>

Reminds me of the IBM Moonies that invented it. <g> It worked for Big Blue till Gates got em. Maybe it'll work for DoCoMo till Ebbers gets them. We need to see how Chris Gent manipulates this.

Never knock FUD (provided that the perp is skillful enough to use it effectively. The respected Dr. J is a great practitioner of FUD, but until recently he has not penetrated the huge global GSM community very effectively with it, IMO, and actually it is not FUD, and it is not just he, that is finally potentially making some penetration.

<< Your last link shows that DoCoMo 's plan was to launch WCDMA now - or "early" this year to begin "commercial" operation - if I read the discussion of Malaysian trials of WCDMA correctly >>

I've forgotten already. I have always had March, 2001 in mind relative to "launch". Vodafone is much easier to track. I always go back here (Nokia Discovery) to check, then cross reference to the latest and greatest statement on the DoCoMo WCDMA site:

nokia.com

As Nokia says:

"But first, we pay a visit to Japan's NTT DoCoMo to learn how they are progressing towards a March, 2001 launch of the world's first GSM-based Wideband CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) network"

If you haven't done so click on Mr. Kouji Ohboshi's picture on that page and read what he has to say, and then click on the concept third generation terminal for some real good GSMcentric historical information.

<< Full WCDMA early this year, seems to have slipped a bit as many of these do. 2002 and 2003 seem more realistic, no?

Who said "Full WCDMA early this year" and when did they say it? If me I apologize. What is "Full". Mr. Ohboshi has said "for the network deployment, we envisage a step-by-step approach" (starting in March 2001 and I think they will be lucky to make 2001 commercial launch although they are hell bent to do so).

For my purposes as an investor I am not real interested in WCDMA which is a generic term that will become somewhat obsolete once IMT-2000 standardization occurs, IMO. As a Q investor I am interested most in the standardized release of IMT-MC (cdma2000) Multi Carrier. This will not be in commercial operation much if any quicker than standards based "WCDMA". I am also interested in how Q can interact with the various "WCDMA" implementations.

For the short to medium term haul I am interested in how Q can get revenue stream out of the 2G/2.5G community.

<< Altho perhaps some non standard and data limited version may be rolled out this year or next for FUD purposes >>

I am not expecting anything commercial.

And Best as always, to you.

- Eric -